AIを用いて謎の恐竜足跡の形成過程を解明 (AI sheds light on mysterious dinosaur footprints)

ad

2026-01-27 エディンバラ大学

英エディンバラ大学の研究チームは、人工知能(AI)を用いて謎とされてきた恐竜の足跡の成因を解明する新手法を示した。研究では、保存状態や形状が大きく異なる多数の足跡データをAIに学習させ、恐竜の歩行様式や体重、地面の硬さなどが足跡形成に与える影響を解析した。その結果、従来は別種の恐竜によるものと考えられていた足跡の違いが、実際には同一種が異なる速度や地盤条件で歩行した結果である可能性が高いことが分かった。AI解析により、人の目では判別が難しい微細な特徴やパターンが抽出され、足跡から行動や環境条件を推定する精度が大きく向上した。本成果は、化石記録が乏しい場合でも恐竜の生態を復元する新たな手段を提供し、古生物学研究の進展に寄与するものと期待されている。

AIを用いて謎の恐竜足跡の形成過程を解明 (AI sheds light on mysterious dinosaur footprints)

Scan of a dinosaur footprint from the Jurassic age, Isle of Skye, Scotland. Credit Tone Blakesley.

<関連情報>

偏りのない教師なし機械学習による恐竜の足跡の変異の特定と問題のある標本の分類 Identifying variation in dinosaur footprints and classifying problematic specimens via unbiased unsupervised machine learning

Gregor Hartmann, Tone Blakesley, Paige E. dePolo, and Stephen L. Brusatte

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  Published:January 26, 2026

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527222122

Significance

Dinosaur footprints are iconic fossils, but it is challenging to identify their makers. This is illustrated by a long-standing debate about whether some footprints from the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic belong to birds, which would be ~60 Ma older than the oldest skeletons. Recently, machine learning has been heralded as a tool for classifying and identifying tracks, but existing methods require researchers to supervise the process by labeling training data, which can perpetuate human biases. We use an unsupervised neural network to process a dataset of nearly 2,000 dinosaur tracks, which recognizes eight ways in which they most vary, and which finds that the problematic bird-like tracks are more similar to modern and fossil birds than any other dinosaur.

Abstract

Machine learning holds great promise for classifying and identifying fossils, and has recently been marshaled to identify trackmakers of dinosaur footprints and address long-standing debates over whether some dinosaur tracks are the oldest birds or ornithopods (duck-billed herbivores and kin) in the fossil record, or alternatively were made by nonavian theropods. Existing methods in paleontology, however, require supervision and a priori labeling of training data by researchers, which can lead to bias. We employ an unsupervised machine learning technique for recognizing inherent patterns in shape data, using a disentangled variational autoencoder network, to a database of 1,974 footprints, spanning a diversity of dinosaurs across their evolutionary history, including modern birds. Our neural network identified eight features of shape variation that most differentiate these tracks: overall load and shape (amount of ground contact area), digit spread, digit attachment, heel load, digit and heel emphasis, loading position, heel position, and left–right load. With the unsupervised process finished, we a posteriori labeled each track based on published expert judgments, plotted them into morphospace, and applied distance metrics to group means and nearest neighbors, which showed 80 to 93% agreement with expert identifications. Controversial Late Triassic-Early Jurassic bird-like tracks group with fossil and modern birds and some Middle Jurassic three-toed tracks with ornithopods, supporting an older origin for these groups than recorded by body fossils. We provide an app, DinoTracker, to make this process accessible, and source code that can be adapted to other cases where paleontologists or biologists are studying patterns of shape variation.

生物工学一般
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました