意識に関する主要理論を検証する画期的研究(Landmark study puts leading theories of consciousness to the test)

ad

2025-04-30 バーミンガム大学

バーミンガム大学を含む国際研究チーム「Cogitate Consortium」は、意識の科学的解明を目的に、統合情報理論(IIT)とグローバル神経ワークスペース理論(GNWT)をfMRIやEEGなどを用いて直接比較しました。250人以上の被験者を対象とした結果、IITの予測である後部皮質の同期活動も、GNWTの前頭前野の「点火」活動も確認されず、両理論とも意識の完全な説明には不十分であることが明らかになりました。研究はNature誌に掲載されました。

<関連情報>

グローバルニューロン作業空間と意識の統合情報理論の敵対的検証 Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness

Cogitate Consortium,Oscar Ferrante,Urszula Gorska-Klimowska,Simon Henin,Rony Hirschhorn,Aya Khalaf,Alex Lepauvre,Ling Liu,David Richter,Yamil Vidal,Niccolò Bonacchi,Tanya Brown,Praveen Sripad,Marcelo Armendariz,Katarina Bendtz,Tara Ghafari,Dorottya Hetenyi,Jay Jeschke,Csaba Kozma,David R. Mazumder,Stephanie Montenegro,Alia Seedat,Abdelrahman Sharafeldin,Shujun Yang,… Lucia Melloni
Nature  Published:30 April 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08888-1

意識に関する主要理論を検証する画期的研究(Landmark study puts leading theories of consciousness to the test)

Abstract

Different theories explain how subjective experience arises from brain activity1,2. These theories have independently accrued evidence, but have not been directly compared3. Here we present an open science adversarial collaboration directly juxtaposing integrated information theory (IIT)4,5 and global neuronal workspace theory (GNWT)6,7,8,9,10 via a theory-neutral consortium11,12,13. The theory proponents and the consortium developed and preregistered the experimental design, divergent predictions, expected outcomes and interpretation thereof12. Human participants (n = 256) viewed suprathreshold stimuli for variable durations while neural activity was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and intracranial electroencephalography. We found information about conscious content in visual, ventrotemporal and inferior frontal cortex, with sustained responses in occipital and lateral temporal cortex reflecting stimulus duration, and content-specific synchronization between frontal and early visual areas. These results align with some predictions of IIT and GNWT, while substantially challenging key tenets of both theories. For IIT, a lack of sustained synchronization within the posterior cortex contradicts the claim that network connectivity specifies consciousness. GNWT is challenged by the general lack of ignition at stimulus offset and limited representation of certain conscious dimensions in the prefrontal cortex. These challenges extend to other theories of consciousness that share some of the predictions tested here14,15,16,17. Beyond challenging the theories, we present an alternative approach to advance cognitive neuroscience through principled, theory-driven, collaborative research and highlight the need for a quantitative framework for systematic theory testing and building.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました