断続的断食が伝統的なダイエットと同等の減量効果を示す研究(Intermittent fasting as effective for weight loss as traditional dieting: Study)

ad

2025-07-10 トロント大学

トロント大学の研究によると、断続的断食(IF)は従来のカロリー制限ダイエットと同等に体重減少や心代謝リスクの改善に効果がある。99件・約6,500人のデータを分析した結果、特に隔日断食は短期間でより高い減量効果を示したが、24週間以上の長期では効果差は縮小。血圧や脂質改善も認められ、IFは生活に合わせやすい実践的な手法として注目される。成果は『BMJ』誌に掲載された。

<関連情報>

間欠的絶食戦略と体重およびその他の心代謝リスク因子に対するそれらの効果:無作為化臨床試験の系統的レビューおよびネットワークメタ解析 Intermittent fasting strategies and their effects on body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Zhila Semnani-Azad, postdoctoral fellow,Tauseef A Khan, senior research scientist,Laura Chiavaroli, assistant professor,Victoria Chen, research assistant,Hardil Anup Bhatt, resident physician,Alisia Chen, resident physician,Nicholas Chiang, resident physician,Julianah Oguntala, resident physician,Stefan Kabisch, physician,David CW Lau, professor and physician,Sean Wharton, professor and physician,Arya M Sharma, professor,Leanne Harris, scientist,Lawrence A Leiter, professor and physician,James O Hill, professor,Frank B Hu, professor,Michael EJ Lean, professor and physician,Hana Kahleová, physician,Dario Rahelic, associate professor and physician,Jordi Salas-Salvadó, professor,Cyril WC Kendall, senior research associate,John L Sievenpiper, professor and physician
The BMJ  Published:18 June 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082007

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of intermittent fasting diets, with continuous energy restriction or unrestricted (ad-libitum) diets on intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes from randomised clinical trials.

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources

Medline, Embase, and central databases from inception to 14 November 2024.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

Randomised clinical trials comparing the association of intermittent fasting diets (alternate day fasting, time restricted eating, and whole day fasting), continuous energy restriction, and ad-libitum diets were included.

Main outcomes

Outcomes included body weight (primary) and measures of anthropometry, glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, and markers of liver disease.

Data synthesis

A network meta-analysis based on a frequentist framework was performed with data expressed as mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE).

Results

99 randomised clinical trials involving 6582 adults of varying health conditions (720 healthy, 5862 existing health conditions) were identified. All intermittent fasting and continuous energy restriction diet strategies reduced body weight when compared with ad-libitum diet. Compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only form of intermittent fasting diet strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction (mean difference -1.29 kg (95% CI -1.99 to -0.59), moderate certainty of evidence). Additionally, alternate day fasting showed a trivial reduction in body weight compared with both time restricted eating and whole day fasting (mean difference -1.69 kg (-2.49 to -0.88) and -1.05 kg (-1.90 to -0.19), respectively, both with moderate certainty of evidence). Estimates were similar among trials with less than 24 weeks follow-up (n=76); however, moderate-to-long-term trials (≥24 weeks, n=17) only showed benefits in weight reduction in diet strategies compared with ad-libitum. Furthermore, in comparisons between intermittent fasting strategies, alternate day fasting lowered total cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-high density lipoprotein compared with time restricted eating. Compared with whole day fasting, however, time restricted eating resulted in a small increase in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol. No differences were noted between intermittent fasting, continuous energy restriction, and ad-libitum diets for HbA1c and high density lipoprotein.

Conclusions

Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit of weight loss with alternate day fasting in shorter duration trials. The current evidence provides some indication that intermittent fasting diets have similar benefits to continuous energy restriction for weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors. Longer duration trials are needed to further substantiate these findings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05309057.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました