UWの研究者が、一般的な消毒剤の抗生物質耐性に対する遺伝的レベルでの効果をテスト(UW researchers test common disinfectants’ abilities to fight antibiotic resistance at the genetic level)

ad

2025-08-11 ワシントン大学 (UW)

ワシントン大学の研究で、病院や医療現場で使われる9種類の消毒剤(エタノール、過酸化水素、塩素系、フェノール系、UV光など)が、抗生物質耐性菌とその耐性遺伝子に与える影響を比較した。多くの消毒剤は細菌を死滅させたが、耐性を担うDNAは分解されず、死菌から他の菌への水平伝播のリスクが残ることが判明。特に塩素系はDNA分解効果が低く、フェノール系で有効な場合もあった。最もDNA損傷効果が高かったのはUV光で、殺菌と同時に耐性遺伝子の破壊にも有効だった。DNA分解効果を考慮した消毒剤選択の必要性が示された。

<関連情報>

医療用および個人用消毒剤による細胞内細菌の抗生物質耐性遺伝子の分解と不活化 Degradation and Deactivation of Intracellular Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Commonly Used Healthcare and Personal Care Disinfectants

Huan He,Sin-Yi Liou,Kyle K. Shimabuku,Peiran Zhou,Yegyun Choi,John S. Meschke,Marilyn C. Roberts,Yunho Lee,and Michael C. Dodd
Environmental Science & Technology  Published: April 21, 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10223

Abstract

UWの研究者が、一般的な消毒剤の抗生物質耐性に対する遺伝的レベルでの効果をテスト(UW researchers test common disinfectants’ abilities to fight antibiotic resistance at the genetic level)

This work investigated efficacies of commonly used healthcare and personal care disinfectants, including glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine, ethanol, povidone-iodine, benzalkonium chloride, phenol, free chlorine, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and 254 nm UV light, in degrading (as measured by qPCR analyses of ∼1000 bp amplicon loss) and deactivating (as measured by transforming activity loss) bacterial antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) during inactivation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) on inanimate surfaces or in aqueous suspension. Intracellular ARGs (iARGs) blt, mecA, and ampC, within vegetative cells of Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively, were treated on PTFE and/or stainless-steel surfaces or in aqueous phosphate buffer (PB; H2O2 only), to simulate potential healthcare and personal care cleaning applications under representative disinfectant exposure conditions. No chemical disinfectant yielded more than limited (≤1.9log10) iARG degradation/deactivation under the conditions investigated, even when ARB cells were extensively inactivated (at levels from 3.1log10 to ≥6log10). In contrast, UV irradiation yielded up to ∼2.8–3.2log10 iARG degradation/deactivation at corresponding ARB inactivation levels up to ∼4log10 in the case of the blt gene within B. subtilis cells on PTFE surfaces, though levels of iARG degradation/deactivation and ARB inactivation were generally lower than expected based on prior aqueous-phase results, likely due to light-shielding effects at the typical ∼108–109 CFU/mL cell inoculum densities used for surface disinfection tests. During exposure to H2O2 in PB, iARG deactivation and ARB inactivation reached up to 1.7log10 and >3.5log10, respectively, while iARG degradation was minimal (≤0.2log10); this appears to be driven by DNA-strand fragmentation (as observed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis) likely resulting from reaction with endogenous HO (or Fe(IV)) generated via intracellular iron-catalyzed H2O2 decomposition. While all investigated disinfectants were able to effectively inactivate ARB cells themselves, these results demonstrate that most are ineffective in simultaneously degrading and deactivating iARGs, highlighting the potential benefits of employing disinfectants such as 254 nm UV light, that selectively target bacterial DNA, to improve mitigation of antibiotic resistance dissemination.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました