生態実験が人間中心的すぎる可能性を発見(Researchers Find Certain Ecological Experiments May Be Too Human-Centric)

ad

2025-10-22 中国科学院(CAS)

Web要約 の発言:
中国科学院(CAS)の研究チームは、ヒトのゲノムに自らのコピーを挿入するレトロトランスポゾン「L1(LINE-1)」がどのようにDNAへ組み込まれるか、その分子機構を初めて明らかにした。L1は全ヒトゲノムの約17%を占める可動性配列で、突然変異や遺伝病の原因にもなるが、その挿入過程の詳細は不明だった。研究では構造解析と生化学的実験を組み合わせ、L1の逆転写酵素が「構造化DNA」と呼ばれる折り畳まれた二次構造を認識して結合し、そこを起点に逆転写・挿入反応を進めることを発見。この構造化DNAの存在がL1の標的選択性を決定し、ゲノムの安定性や多様性形成に重要な役割を果たすことが示された。成果は、L1の活性化が関与するがんや神経疾患の理解にもつながると期待される。研究論文は『Nature Structural & Molecular Biology』誌に掲載され、ヒトゲノム進化の動的メカニズムを解明する重要な一歩となった。

生態実験が人間中心的すぎる可能性を発見(Researchers Find Certain Ecological Experiments May Be Too Human-Centric)
Designs of the plasticine models in the experiment. (Image by HUANG Xiao)

<関連情報>

人間は知覚するが動物は知覚しない:生物間相互作用を評価するための粘土モデルの使用における落とし穴 Humans perceive but animals don’t: pitfalls in using plasticine models for assessing biotic interactions

Xiao Huang and Si-Chong Chen
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences  Published:22 October 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2247

Abstract

Observation methods are crucial for understanding ecological processes. One widely used method is the application of plasticine models that visually mimic prey organisms in assessing biotic interactions. However, questions remain about whether this approach may accurately capture specific interaction intensity and types. Here, we initially synthesized previous studies applying plasticine models to quantify different types of biotic interaction. Following the experimental designs in these studies, we deployed 2430 plasticine models with different sizes, shapes and colours, mimicking various prey types, in natural habitats located in two different biomes across multiple seasons. Our results revealed that attack rates were not significantly different among plasticine models with varying characteristics, whether attack marks were pooled or separated by different animal guilds. This suggests that animals may not consistently distinguish visually different plasticine models as distinct prey types, and attack rates on plasticine models may be influenced by overall animal richness and activity levels rather than exclusively reflecting specific biotic interactions. Our study indicates the existence of anthropocentric biases in the application of plasticine models to assess biotic interactions. We highlight the importance of incorporating the habits and behaviours of studied animal taxa in ecological experimental designs to minimize anthropocentric biases and ensure an accurate assessment of ecological processes.

細胞遺伝子工学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました