動物の警告色戦略に関する国際研究(Global study finds what influences animals’ antipredator colour strategies) Global study finds what influences animals’ antipredator colour strategies

ad

2025-09-26 スウォンジー大学

スウォンジー大学を中心とする国際研究チームは、世界規模で動物の「捕食者回避のための体色戦略」を比較しました。解析の結果、警告色やカモフラージュといった戦略は、主に生息環境の植生密度や捕食圧に依存しており、熱帯林では鮮やかな警告色が優位に、開けた環境ではカモフラージュが効果的であることが示されました。また、体サイズや活動時間帯も色戦略に影響していました。この研究は、生態系における進化的多様性の背景を明らかにし、気候変動や生息地改変が動物の生存戦略に及ぼす影響を予測する基盤を提供します。

動物の警告色戦略に関する国際研究(Global study finds what influences animals’ antipredator colour strategies) Global study finds what influences animals’ antipredator colour strategies
Credit: Stansislav Harvancik.

<関連情報>

昆虫の抗捕食者色彩における地球規模の選択 Global selection on insect antipredator coloration

Iliana Medina, Alice Exnerová, Klára Daňková, Olivier Penacchio, […] , and William L. Allen
Science  Published:25 Sep 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr7368

Editor’s summary

Many animal species have evolved camouflage or aposematic (warning) coloration, color patterns that protect them from predation. Medina et al. designed a distributed experiment with artificial Lepidopteran prey to assess how characteristics of the ecosystem influenced the effectiveness of these strategies. They found that camouflage was more beneficial when it was rarely used by prey and in low-light environments, whereas warning coloration was less beneficial in high-predation environments, where competition between predators may motivate them to sample aposematic insects. This comparative analysis helps to explain the distribution and evolution of antipredator coloration. —Bianca Lopez

Abstract

Natural selection has repeatedly led to the evolution of two alternative antipredator color strategies—camouflage to avoid detection and aposematism to advertise unprofitability—but we lack understanding of how ecological context favors one strategy over the other. We conducted a globally replicated predation experiment at 21 sites on six continents to test how predator community, prey community, and visual environment influenced the predation risk of 15,018 artificial paper “moth” prey with cryptic or warning coloration. Results indicated that aposematic strategies fare better in environments with low predation intensity, whereas camouflage strategies are advantaged when other camouflaged prey species are rare and when light levels are low. This study demonstrates how multiple mechanisms shape antipredator strategies, helping to explain the evolution and global distribution of camouflaged and aposematic animals.

生物環境工学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました