妊婦に静脈内投与された鉄は、経口摂取された鉄よりも効果的である(Iron given to pregnant women intravenously is more effective than iron taken orally)

ad

2024-09-19 カロリンスカ研究所(KI)

妊娠中の貧血治療において、静脈内に投与される鉄製剤「フェリックカルボキシマルトース」は、経口の鉄剤よりも速く効果的であり、同等の安全性を持つことが確認されました。ナイジェリアなど貧血が多い地域では、経口鉄剤が効果を示さないことがあり、静脈内投与が効果的な代替手段となります。この研究は1,056人の妊婦を対象に行われ、静脈内鉄製剤は鉄欠乏性貧血を迅速に改善し、胎児への悪影響もないことが示されました。

<関連情報>

ナイジェリアの妊婦の貧血に対する鉄剤の静脈内投与と経口投与の比較試験(IVON):非盲検無作為化比較試験 Intravenous versus oral iron for anaemia among pregnant women in Nigeria (IVON): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Prof Bosede B Afolabi DM, Ochuwa A Babah FWACS, Prof Titilope A Adeyemo FMCPath, Mobolanle Balogun FWACP, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas PhD, Ajibola I Abioye PhD, Opeyemi R Akinajo FWACS, Prof Hadiza S Galadanci FRCOG, Rachel A Quao MSc, Hameed Adelabu BSc, Prof Nadia A Sam-Agudu MD, Victoria O Adaramoye FWACS, Abdulazeez Abubakar MBBS, Bolanle Banigbe PhD, Gbenga Olorunfemi FWACS, Prof Lenka Beňová PhD  Elin C Larsson PhD, Kristi S Annerstedt PhD, Prof Claudia Hanson PhD, Prof Jim Thornton MD…Sabo Umar-Suleiman
The Lancet Global Health  Available online: 18 September 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00239-0

妊婦に静脈内投与された鉄は、経口摂取された鉄よりも効果的である(Iron given to pregnant women intravenously is more effective than iron taken orally)

Summary

Background
Oral iron for anaemia in pregnancy is often not well tolerated, with poor adherence. Iron administered intravenously might address these tolerance and adherence issues. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus oral ferrous sulphate on anaemia and iron deficiency among pregnant women in Nigeria.

Methods
We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial of pregnant women (aged 15–49 years) with haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations of less than 10 g/dL at 20–32 weeks’ gestation from 11 primary, secondary, or tertiary health facilities in Nigeria (five in Lagos and six in Kano). Exclusion criteria included vaginal bleeding, blood transfusion or major surgery within the past 3 months, symptomatic anaemia, anaemia known to be unrelated to iron deficiency, clinically confirmed malabsorption syndrome, previous hypersensitivity to any form of iron, pre-existing maternal depression or other major psychiatric illness, immune-related diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, or severe allergic reactions. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by nurses and doctors using a web-based randomisation service to either receive a single dose of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (20 mg/kg to a maximum of 1000 mg) or oral ferrous sulphate (200 mg; 65 mg elemental iron) three times daily until 6 weeks postpartum. The study was primarily unmasked. Primary outcomes were maternal anaemia (Hb <11 g/dL) at 36 weeks’ gestation and preterm birth at before 37 weeks’ gestation, with analysis by intention to treat in participants with available data. This study was registered at the ISRCTN registry on Dec 10, 2020 (ISRCTN63484804) and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04976179) on April 7, 2021.

Findings
Between Aug 10, 2021, and Dec 15, 2022, 13 724 pregnant women were screened for eligibility. 12 668 were excluded due to ineligibility for inclusion, and 1056 provided consent to participate and were randomly assigned to either the intravenous or oral administration groups. 527 were assigned to the intravenous ferric carboxymaltose group and 529 were assigned to the oral ferrous sulphate group. 518 in the intravenous group were assessed at 36 weeks’ gestational age and after 518 deliveries, and 511 completed the 6 weeks postpartum visit. 513 in the oral ferrous sulphate group were assessed at 36 weeks’ gestational age and after 512 deliveries, and 501 completed the 6 weeks postpartum visit. No significant difference was found in anaemia at 36 weeks (299 [58%] of 517 in the intravenous group vs 305 [61%] of 503 in the oral group; risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·85–1·06; p=0·36), nor in preterm birth (73 [14%] of 518 vs 77 [15%] of 513; 0·94, 0·70–1·26; p=0·66). There were no significant differences in adverse events. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (in six participants) and vomiting (in three participants) in the oral group and fatigue (in two participants) and headache (in two participants) in the intravenous group.

Interpretation
Although the effect on overall anaemia did not differ, intravenous iron reduced the prevalence of iron deficiency to a greater extent than oral iron and was considered to be safe. We recommend that intravenous iron be considered for anaemic pregnant women in Nigeria and similar settings.

Funding
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました