心臓弁狭窄の2つの原因の違いを解明(UC Irvine researchers find differences between two causes of heart valve narrowing)

ad

2026-01-22 カリフォルニア大学アーバイン校(UCI)

University of California, Irvineの研究チームは、心臓弁狭窄症の2つの主要原因に明確な生物学的差異があることを明らかにした。心臓弁狭窄は、主に加齢に伴う変性(石灰化)と、先天的な二尖弁に起因して発症するが、両者は臨床的には同様に扱われてきた。本研究では、患者由来の組織解析と分子レベルの比較により、炎症反応、石灰化経路、細胞シグナル伝達において異なるメカニズムが関与していることを示した。これらの差異は、病気の進行速度や治療反応性に影響する可能性があり、画一的な治療戦略の限界を示唆する。研究者らは、原因別に最適化された治療や、進行を抑制する新たな分子標的の開発につながると期待している。本成果は、心臓弁疾患の精密医療(プレシジョンメディシン)を前進させる重要な知見である。

<関連情報>

僧帽弁狭窄症の二つの側面:リウマチ性疾患および僧帽弁輪石灰化誘発性疾患の構造的および血行動態的特徴の解明 Two Faces of Mitral Stenosis: Uncovering Structural and Hemodynamic Signatures of Rheumatic and Mitral Annular Calcification–Induced Disease

Mohammad S. Hashemi, PhD, Peter Abdelmaseeh, MD, Atif Nehvi, MD, Gregg S. Pressman, MD, and Arash Kheradvar, MD, PhD
Journal of the American Heart Association  Published: 21 January 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.045018

心臓弁狭窄の2つの原因の違いを解明(UC Irvine researchers find differences between two causes of heart valve narrowing)

Abstract

Background

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is common and associated with increased cardiovascular risk and, when severe, mitral stenosis (MS). MAC‐related MS differs anatomically and hemodynamically from rheumatic MS (RMS), challenging standard diagnostic methods. This study compares structural and flow characteristics, including  kinetic energy losses, across MAC‐related MS, RMS, and normal mitral valves, and evaluates the applicability of conventional diagnostic metrics in MAC.

Methods

Three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic data sets from 70 patients (22 normal mitral valves, 26 RMS valves, 22 MAC valves) were used to obtain linear, area, and volumetric measurements for valve comparison. Representative valves from each group were converted into 3‐dimensional silicone models for in vitro testing in a heart flow simulator. Transmitral flow was assessed with particle image velocimetry, flow energetics were quantified, and coefficients of contraction were derived from geometric and effective orifice areas.

Results

Compared with RMS, MAC‐related MS had smaller anteroposterior dimensions, reduced valve volume, and lower coefficients of contraction. MAC demonstrated the highest transmitral velocities and energy dissipation in vitro. Unlike the normal model, neither MAC nor RMS produced a consistent transmitral vortex ring. Despite having a larger geometric orifice, MAC MS produced a greater pressure drop than RMS, likely due to increased flow disruption and lower coefficients of contraction.

Conclusions

MAC‐related MS represents a unique pathophysiological entity, characterized by distinct structural and hemodynamic features. These findings underscore the necessity for disease‐specific diagnostic frameworks and multimodality imaging strategies to inform clinical decision making and guide emerging therapeutic approaches.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました