救急医のストレスに患者の苛立ちが与える影響を実験的に解明(It’s Not Just on ‘The Pitt’: Real-Life Emergency Doctors are Stressed Out―And Patient Irritation Plays a Significant Role)

ad

2026-07-13 マサチューセッツ大学アマースト校

米国マサチューセッツ大学アマースト校の研究チームは、救急医が日常的に強いストレスにさらされており、その心理的負担が患者へのいら立ちや対応の質に影響を及ぼす可能性があることを明らかにした。研究では、救急医を対象に勤務中のストレスや感情の変化を継続的に調査した結果、多忙な診療や時間的制約、患者対応の負荷によってストレスが蓄積し、患者に対するいら立ちが増加する傾向が確認された。一方で、こうした感情は医師個人の資質ではなく、救急医療現場の過酷な勤務環境や業務負担に起因することが示唆された。研究者らは、医師の精神的健康を支援し、休息や勤務体制の改善、組織的なストレス軽減策を導入することが、医療従事者のバーンアウト防止だけでなく、患者とのコミュニケーションや医療の質、安全性の向上にもつながると指摘している。本研究は、救急医療における職場環境改善の重要性を示す知見を提供する。

A person pointing a finger at a doctor<関連情報>

救急医がイライラした行動を示す患者に遭遇した場合:医師の感情と臨床推論を調査するランダム化シナリオ実験 When emergency physicians meet patients displaying irritable behaviours: a randomised vignette-based experiment investigating physicians’ emotions and clinical reasoning

Linda M Isbell,Nathan R Huff,Guanyu Liu,Howard Bessen,Vincent Kan,Isabella Levesque,Matthew Bird,Peter Smulowitz
BMJ: Quality & Safety  Published:July 12, 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019061

Abstract

Background Clinical encounters with patients who display challenging behaviours (eg, rude, demanding) are increasingly common in emergency departments and can heighten negative emotions, compromise healthcare quality and impact physician well-being. This study investigated the influence of patients’ irritable behaviours on physicians’ emotions, clinical assessments, decisions and behaviours, and the extent to which physicians’ predispositions to experience anxiety and concern about bad clinical outcomes (ie, stress from uncertainty) may magnify these effects. We also explored whether these effects differed if patients had a stigmatised condition (mental illness history).

Methods Experienced emergency physicians (n=134) completed a randomised vignette-based experiment between June and August 2022. Physicians assessed four patients in computer-simulated, interactive clinical encounters in which patient behaviour (irritable vs calm) and mental illness history (present vs absent) were varied within subjects. Physicians viewed each patient’s health record, a video-recorded encounter and physical exam results, and provided patient assessments, clinical decisions, ordered tests and reported a diagnosis. Physicians also reported their emotional reactions to each patient and completed the Stress from Uncertainty Scale (SUS) after assessing all patients. We adhered to the Guideline for Reporting Vignette Experiments.

Results Physicians reported greater anger, anxiety and fatigue and less empathy, happiness and engagement during encounters with patients displaying irritable (vs calm) behaviours (all ps<0.001) and evaluated those with irritable behaviours as poorer historians, more likely to be exaggerating pain, less cooperative, engaged, likeable, likely to adhere to treatment and likely to return to work (all ps<0.001). Interactions revealed that SUS amplified the impact of patients’ irritable behaviours with high SUS associated with greater physician anger, anxiety and fatigue (all ps≤0.04) and with physicians evaluating these patients as poorer historians, less likely to adhere to treatment and less likeable (all ps≤0.03). Effects were similar regardless of patient mental illness history (all ps>0.60). No effects emerged for clinical decisions, behaviour or diagnosis.

Conclusion Although patients’ irritable behaviours adversely influenced physicians’ emotions, engagement and patient assessments, they did not affect the quality of care provided (ie, clinical decisions, behaviour, diagnostic accuracy). Despite this, our findings have important implications. Physicians’ reactions to patients displaying irritable behaviours may reduce the quality of physician-patient relationships (eg, reduce trust, effective communication) and contribute to physician burnout—both of which can compromise patient care. Additional research is needed to investigate the multiple ways in which emotional factors can impact patient care quality and safety.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました