多細胞性は直接的利益なしに進化した可能性(Multicellularity may have evolved without direct benefits)

ad

2026-04-20 マックス・プランク研究所(MPG)

ドイツのマックス・プランク協会の研究は、多細胞性が必ずしも直接的な進化的利益を伴わなくても成立し得ることを示した。従来は、多細胞化は個体の生存や繁殖に有利な特性として進化したと考えられてきたが、本研究では単細胞生物の集団が環境条件や物理的相互作用により自然に集合し、その結果として多細胞的構造が形成される可能性を理論・実験の両面から検証した。こうした集合体は当初は明確な適応的利点を持たなくても、後に機能分化や協調行動が進むことで進化的安定性を獲得し得るという。これは多細胞生物の起源に関する従来の適応中心の理解を見直し、進化過程における偶発性や物理的制約の重要性を示唆する成果である。

多細胞性は直接的利益なしに進化した可能性(Multicellularity may have evolved without direct benefits)

Left panel: escaping competition may occur when the unicellular ancestor (grey cells) prefers one environment. If groups arising in the multicellular life cycle (red cells and groups) instead localise in the other environment, they escape competition and allow the multicellular life cycle to persist.
Right panel: if ancestors do not show a strong preference for either environment, multicellularity can still emerge through environmental exploitation, provided that groups preferentially occupy the more resource-rich environment.
© Yuriy Pichugin

<関連情報>

多細胞生物の進化には直接的な利益は必ずしも必要ではない Direct benefits are not necessary for the evolution of multicellularity

Daniel Jorge,Merlijn Staps,Yuriy Pichugin & Corina E. Tarnita
Nature Ecology & Evolution  Published:20 April 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-026-03044-y

Abstract

The evolution of multicellularity required nascent multicellular life to persist in a unicellular world. Because grouping usually comes with steep costs, multicellularity had to confer some benefits. While direct benefits—in which cells in groups outperform single cells under the same conditions—can clearly suffice for multicellularity to evolve, whether they were also necessary has not been systematically explored. Here we develop a general model for the evolution of multicellularity in a spatially heterogeneous environment and show that direct benefits are, in fact, not necessary. When nascent multicellular groups differ from their unicellular ancestor in their spatial distribution (for example, because groups sink), two distinct indirect benefits can emerge: escape from competition from the unicellular ancestor and increased exploitation of desirable environments. Either benefit can drive the evolution of multicellularity in the absence of direct benefits. As a case study, we show that in the Proterozoic Ocean, where several multicellular eukaryotic lineages originated, escape from competition could have driven the evolution of multicellularity by offsetting the costs of diffusion limitation and oxygen deprivation. Our work systematically uncovers hitherto underappreciated mechanisms by which multicellularity can evolve, even under seemingly adverse conditions, and highlights the importance of ecology in explaining major evolutionary transitions.

細胞遺伝子工学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました