災害時に高齢者の施設ケアは続けられるか―利用者・排泄衛生・職員向けの備え―

ad

2026-11-06 京都大学

京都大学などの研究グループは、地震や水害などの災害発生時に、高齢者施設が利用者へのケアを継続するために必要な備えの実態を調査した。高齢者施設では事業継続計画(BCP)の策定が進んでいるが、計画の存在が実際のケア継続を保証するわけではない。研究チームは静岡県内の特別養護老人ホームや有料老人ホームなど9種類、計1,366施設を対象に質問票調査を実施し、回答のあった632施設を分析した。その結果、95.9%の施設が災害時も施設内でケアを続けることを想定していた一方、具体的な継続計画を持つ施設は37.7%にとどまった。利用者向けの飲料水3日分を備蓄していた施設は78.6%、食料は76.3%だったが、簡易トイレ類は43.2%、排泄物の凝固剤は17.2%だった。また、職員向けの備えも全体の約半数にとどまった。災害時の高齢者ケアを維持するには、BCPの策定だけでなく、利用者と職員双方を対象とした具体的な物資・衛生・支援体制の整備が必要であることを示した。

災害時に高齢者の施設ケアは続けられるか―利用者・排泄衛生・職員向けの備え―
高齢者居住施設における災害時のケア継続に向けた3つの備え(森寛子作成 ChatGPT 5.6 Sol使用)

<関連情報>

⽇本の⾼齢者介護施設における災害時のケア継続に向けた実務的な備え:県全域を対象とした調査 Operational Preparedness for Care Continuity During Disasters in Japanese Aged-Care Facilities: A Prefecture-Wide Survey

Hiroko Mori,Hatoko Sasaki and Takeo Nakayama
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness  Published:22 October 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2026.10445

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the implementation of preparedness measures for stockpiling of essential supplies and sanitation in Japanese aged-care facilities, as specified in Japan’s Business Continuity Planning guidelines.

MethodsA prefecture-wide survey was conducted from February to August 2023 among all residential aged-care facilities in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Self-reported anticipated evacuation strategies were classified into four types. Preparedness indicators were compared by evacuation strategy, provider sector, and resident mobility using chi-square tests. Indicators included stockpiling items and sanitation measures, as well as staff supplies not explicitly addressed in the guidelines.

ResultsThe response rate was 46% (632/1366). Of the 632 facilities analyzed, 96% anticipated providing onsite care. Although approximately three-quarters had 3-day food and water supplies for residents, only 64% of facilities with an explicit shelter-in-place plan had supplies for staff. Sanitation preparedness was limited: only 43% had emergency toilet supplies, and 17% had toilet waste solidifying agents.

ConclusionsWe identified gaps between Japan’s guidelines and disaster preparedness practices in aged-care facilities. Facilities with explicit shelter-in-place plans were not necessarily better prepared, particularly regarding sanitation measures. Limited preparedness for staff support was a critical challenge. Addressing these gaps is essential for continuity of care during disasters.

医療・健康
ad
ad
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました