紙のマンガの読書効果を脳科学で実証 ──デジタル書籍より左脳と右脳の活動が省エネ化──

ad

2026-06-04 東京大学,株式会社コアミックス

東京大学とコアミックスの共同研究グループは、紙のマンガと電子書籍が脳活動に与える影響をfMRIで比較し、紙の本で読んだ場合に脳活動の「省エネ化」が生じることを初めて実証した。大学生・大学院生25名を対象に、物語の前半を紙またはタブレットで読ませ、その後MRI内で後半を読ませながら内容理解課題を実施した。その結果、電子書籍では前後の情報統合を要する問題で回答時間が有意に長くなった。一方、紙で読んだ場合は、後半読書時の左脳言語野や問題解答時の右前頭葉の活動が低下しており、脳がより少ない活動量で理解や推論を行っていたことが示された。研究者らはこれを「脳活動の省エネ化」と表現しており、単なる活性化の増減ではなく、情報処理の効率的な統合を反映すると考えている。本成果は、紙媒体が持つ空間的・触覚的手掛かりが物語理解を支え、その後の認知処理負荷を軽減する可能性を示しており、教育や読書環境の設計に重要な知見を提供する。

紙のマンガの読書効果を脳科学で実証 ──デジタル書籍より左脳と右脳の活動が省エネ化──
紙の本の読書後に生じた省エネ化を示す脳活動
(図の左が左脳で言語野を含む)

<関連情報>

紙の本とデジタル機器で対比したマンガの読書:脳における中核的および補助的な統合過程に対する前向き効果 Manga reading on paper vs. digital devices: Prospective effects on core and supportive integration processes in the brain

Keita Umejima,Yuki Sunada,Kuniyoshi L. Sakai
PLOS One
  Published: June 3, 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349778

Abstract

Reading on paper reportedly improves story comprehension compared to its digital version, although the underlying neuroscientific mechanisms remain unclear. We used a format of Japanese manga stories as visual narratives told in halves, each of which depicted the same events from the different perspectives of two protagonists. We examined how the medium used to read the first halves, either on a paper book (Paper preparatory condition) or on an electronic tablet (Tablet preparatory condition), facilitated reading of the second halves for the memorized stories, which they read on an electronic display with continuous empathy ratings. Magnetic resonance scanning was conducted during the latter reading and during answering two sets of questions: Set 1 that could be answered after reading the first half alone, and Set 2 that required comprehension from both halves. Behavioral results showed prospective effects of reading manga stories on a paper book or an electronic tablet, such that the response times were prolonged in Set 2 for the Tablet condition. By comparing the results of Sets 1 and 2 with correct answers for each story, we found significant response time differences for the Tablet condition alone. Moreover, for the Paper condition, activations in the left frontal regions significantly decreased while reading the second halves, and those in the right frontal regions also decreased in Set 1. Furthermore, core left frontal activations were highest in Set 2 for the Tablet condition, while supportive right frontal activations correlated with individual accuracy rates in Set 2 for the Tablet condition, indicating that excessive integration processes support improved performances required by correct answers. The present results demonstrate stronger prospective effects of reading on paper books, such that linguistic and narrative-structural integration processes are facilitated and led to saved excessive activations.

教育
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました