精神科医が同じ患者を診断して一致するのは55%にすぎない、新研究(New study: Psychiatrists agree on a diagnosis in only 55% of cases)

ad

2026-09-09 コペンハーゲン大学(UCPH)

デンマーク・コペンハーゲン大学の研究チームは、精神科医による精神疾患の診断がどの程度一致するかを19か国の医師1,038人を対象に調査した。参加者はWHOのICD-10に基づき、9種類の標準化された症例のうち2例を診断した。その結果、同じ患者について精神科医同士が同じ診断を下した割合はわずか55%だった。特に統合失調症および関連疾患では診断のばらつきが大きく、基準診断との一致率も37~54%と低かった。一方、双極性障害は94%、強迫性障害は92%と比較的高かった。経験年数による有意差はなく、単純な臨床経験不足では説明できないことも示された。研究者は、症状の重複や診断カテゴリーの複雑さが不一致の背景にあるとし、より明確な疾患定義や診断分類の見直しが必要だと指摘している。診断の不確実性は患者の治療だけでなく、精神医学研究の信頼性にも影響するとしている。

<関連情報>

21世紀における精神医学的診断の信頼性 Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses in the 21st century

Mateo Boberg,Mads Gram Henriksen,Jonas Berge,Nikolas Fascendini,Martin Jandl,Hanna Karakuła-Juchnowicz,Luís Madeira,Daniele Rossi Grauenfels,…,Julie Nordgaard
Frontiers in Psychiatry  Published:29 July 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1891625

精神科医が同じ患者を診断して一致するのは55%にすぎない、新研究(New study: Psychiatrists agree on a diagnosis in only 55% of cases)

Abstract

Background:
Reliable diagnosis is a cornerstone of medical practice, yet concerns about diagnostic reliability have long haunted psychiatry. In the 1970s, the US–UK Diagnostic Project revealed striking international discrepancies in diagnostic practice. Although operationalized diagnostic criteria were introduced to improve reliability, contemporary evidence indicates that substantial problems persist. To investigate this, we conducted a large-scale international study of diagnostic reliability among medical doctors using standardized clinical case vignettes.

Material and methods:
In this cross−sectional study, medical doctors working in adult psychiatry across 19 countries from two continents assigned ICD−10 diagnoses to written cases. Each doctor was randomly assigned two of nine available cases. Inter−rater reliability among medical doctors was assessed using Krippendorff’s α. Diagnostic variability at case-level was quantified using Shannon entropy. We also calculated diagnostic accuracy as concordance with predefined best-estimate reference diagnoses.

Results:
A total of 1,038 medical doctors provided 1,902 diagnostic assessments across nine cases. Inter−rater reliability among medical doctors was modest (Krippendorff’s α = 0.48), indicating that diagnostic agreement between two doctors occurred in roughly 55% of cases. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 66%, with the lowest accuracy observed for cases depicting schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Diagnostic disagreements followed systematic patterns, with schizophrenia cases frequently misclassified as OCD, personality disorder, or bipolar disorder.

Conclusions:
Diagnostic inter−rater reliability among medical doctors remains limited, even under standardized conditions. The observed patterns of misclassification suggest that the variability in diagnostic assessments reflects systematic differences in clinical interpretation rather than random error, pointing to challenges in assessing psychopathology as well as ambiguities in psychiatric classification.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました