おやつ探し課題で犬の認知機能低下を調べる新たな手法(Hide-and-seek for treats offers a new window into cognitive decline in dogs)

ad

2026-10-22 アリゾナ大学

米国アリゾナ大学の研究チームは、犬の認知機能の低下を認知症の明確な症状が現れる前に検出する評価法「CANID(犬の神経心理学的認知障害評価)」を開発した。約40分で実施するこの検査では、おやつを使った3種類の課題により、記憶力や行動の柔軟性、衝動を抑える能力を評価する。透明な筒からおやつを取り出す課題、隠されたおやつの位置を記憶する課題、障害物の周囲で通路の変更に対応する課題を組み合わせ、総合スコアを算出する。239頭の犬を対象に検証した結果、スコアは安定しており、6か月後や1年後の再検査でも一貫性が確認された。従来の飼い主への質問票では、症状が明確になってから認知機能の低下が把握されることが多いが、CANIDは犬が7~8歳になる頃から現れる微細な変化を捉え、認知症の兆候が目立つ12~14歳より早い段階での評価を可能にする。今後、犬の認知機能の維持や予防法の研究に役立つほか、アルツハイマー病など人間の認知症研究への貢献も期待される。

おやつ探し課題で犬の認知機能低下を調べる新たな手法(Hide-and-seek for treats offers a new window into cognitive decline in dogs)
As part of a task, a dog reaches into the open end of a clear tube to get a treat. Emma Kristal/Arizona Canine Cognition Center

<関連情報>

犬の神経心理学的障害に対する認知評価(CANID):認知老化研究のための効率的で再現性があり、感度の高い評価法 Cognitive assessment for neuropsychological impairments in dogs (CANID): an efficient, repeatable, and sensitive evaluation for studies of cognitive aging

Stephanie H. Hargrave, Emily E. Bray, Lorelei R. Switzer, Stephanie McGrath, Gene E. Alexander, Theadora Block, Elizabeth Carranza, Naomi Chao, Laura E. L. C. Douglas, Janet Galante, Emily Hilyard, Dara Jonkoski, Brenda S. Kennedy, Emma Kristal, Julie A. Moreno, Daniel E. L. Promislow, David A. Raichlen, Noah Stetson, Kaitlyn Tereso, Nova Vogel, Dog Aging Project Consortium & Evan L. MacLean
Animal Cognition  Published:18 September 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-026-02112-x  Early provide

Abstract

We introduce the Cognitive Assessment for Neuropsychological Impairments in Dogs (CANID), a functional evaluation consisting of three cognitive tasks that measure aspects of memory and executive function. CANID can be implemented in a single ~40-min evaluation, was designed for studies of cognitive aging in community dwelling dogs, and is sensitive to age-related cognitive differences beginning in mid-life. We developed a scoring system using a baseline sample (N = 239) and repeat testing at six (N = 138) and twelve (N = 114) month follow-up. Overall CANID scores had substantial repeatability at six (ICC = 0.63, 95% CI [0.51, 0.72]) and twelve (ICC = 0.59, 95% CI [0.47, 0.70]) months, as did all task-specific subscores. CANID scores at 6-month follow-up suggested modest practice effects (0.23 SD improvement in overall score relative to baseline), similar to those reported in human studies, but we did not find evidence for practice effects at one-year follow-up. To facilitate CANID’s use, we provide detailed protocols, video libraries, data recording instruments, experimenter training guidelines, and R code for scoring in an Open Science Framework repository.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました