遠隔医療の普及が地方の精神医療アクセスを改善していないことを示す研究(Growth in Telemedicine Has Not Improved Mental Health Care Access in Rural Areas, Study Finds)

ad

2026-03-05 ブラウン大学

ブラウン大学(Brown University)の研究は、遠隔医療(テレメディシン)がメンタルヘルスケアへのアクセス拡大に与える影響を分析した。研究では、オンライン診療の導入前後で精神医療サービスの利用状況を比較し、特に地方在住者や医療資源が限られた地域の患者において、治療へのアクセスが改善したことを確認した。また、遠隔診療は通院時間や移動の負担を減らし、継続的な治療を受けやすくする効果も示された。一方で、インターネット環境やデジタル機器へのアクセスの差が、サービス利用の格差を生む可能性も指摘された。研究者は、テレメディシンの利点を活かしつつ、デジタル格差を考慮した政策や医療体制の整備が、より公平なメンタルヘルスケア提供に重要であると述べている。

<関連情報>

メンタルヘルス専門医による遠隔医療の普及と患者の所在地 Mental Health Specialist Telemedicine Uptake and Patient Location

Jacob Jorem, MD, JD; Andrew D. Wilcock, PhD; Alisa B. Busch, MD, MS;et al
JAMA Network Open  Published:March 5, 2026
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.0823

遠隔医療の普及が地方の精神医療アクセスを改善していないことを示す研究(Growth in Telemedicine Has Not Improved Mental Health Care Access in Rural Areas, Study Finds)

Key Points

Question What is the association between the proportion of visits delivered via telemedicine by mental health specialists and the percentage of patients living in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities?

Findings In this cohort study of 17 742 mental health specialists serving a Medicare fee-for-service population, greater telemedicine uptake was associated with small increases in the percentage of patients living in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities between 2018 and 2023. A sizeable fraction of the observed changes was accounted for by established patients moving farther away (vs strictly by seeing more new patients from these communities).

Meaning These findings suggest that telemedicine uptake is not associated with substantial increases in the mental health treatment of patients in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities, highlighting the need for tailored policy interventions.

Abstract

Importance Wide geographic disparities in mental health care use exist, particularly between rural and urban areas. Telemedicine could enable mental health specialists to reach patients who live farther away in rural communities and communities with low access to care.

Objective To examine the association of the proportion of mental health specialists’ visits delivered via telemedicine and the share of their visits to patients living in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities.

Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examined Medicare fee-for-service claims for mental health specialist services from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023. Specialists were categorized into quartiles based on their 2021 telemedicine uptake (lowest, 0%-40% of visits; low-middle, 41%-79%; middle-high, 80%-98%; highest, 99%-100% of visits). Data were analyzed between November 2024 and December 2025.

Exposure Telemedicine use among mental health specialists in 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the proportion of mental health specialists’ patients who lived in (1) a rural area, (2) an area with a mental health specialist shortage, (3) a different state from their specialist, and (4) a community 20 miles or more from their specialist. Differential changes in outcomes between specialists in the highest and lowest telemedicine uptake quartiles were estimated using a difference-in-differences framework. A secondary analysis examined the fraction of the changes observed due to established patients moving their residence vs new patients.

Results The cohort included 17 742 mental health specialists categorized into quartiles based on their telemedicine uptake in 2021. Compared with 2018 and specialists in the lowest telemedicine quartile, specialists with the highest telemedicine use had 0.88 percentage points (95% CI, 0.35-1.39 percentage points) more visits with rural patients in 2023. Similar small changes were observed in the fraction of visits with patients living in mental health specialist shortage areas, in a different state from their specialist, and living 20 miles or more away from their specialist. Specialists with higher telemedicine use visited differentially fewer new patients by 2023 than those with lower use (−3.55 percentage points [95% CI, −5.73 to −1.38 percentage points]).

Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that greater telemedicine uptake was associated with only small increases in the share of visits to patients in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities. Tailored policy interventions may be needed for telemedicine to reach its potential of improving mental health care of individuals with the greatest difficulty accessing it in their local community.

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました