PARP阻害薬と免疫療法の併用による相乗効果を臨床試験で検証 ―基礎研究で期待された相乗効果の再考につながる知見―

ad

2026-11-06 国立がん研究センター

国立がん研究センター東病院、国立病院機構四国がんセンター、久留米大学の研究グループは、相同組換え修復欠損(HRD)陽性の進行卵巣がん患者を対象に、PARP阻害薬オラパリブと免疫チェックポイント阻害薬ペムブロリズマブの併用効果を検証した。医師主導のパイロット臨床試験には30人が参加し、オラパリブ単独群10人と併用群20人を比較した。その結果、がんの縮小が確認された割合は単独群50.0%、併用群70.0%だったが、両群間に明確な治療効果の差は認められなかった。また、基礎研究で期待されていたPARP阻害薬単独による免疫活性化も、患者の腫瘍組織では明確に確認されなかった。一方、併用群では免疫細胞の増加が観察されたものの、治療効果の明確な上乗せには至らなかった。本研究は、細胞や動物モデルで示された薬剤の相乗効果が、必ずしも実際の患者でも再現されるとは限らないことを示している。今後、腫瘍内の免疫環境や薬剤反応の個人差を考慮した治療戦略の再検討が必要である。

PARP阻害薬と免疫療法の併用による相乗効果を臨床試験で検証 ―基礎研究で期待された相乗効果の再考につながる知見―
図:PARP阻害薬と免疫療法の効果

<関連情報>

HRD陽性進行卵巣がん患者に対するオラパリブとペムブロリズマブの術前併用療法:パイロット研究 Neoadjuvant Olaparib and Pembrolizumab Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with HRD-Positive Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Pilot Study

Kenichi Harano; Takehiro Nakao; Shin Nishio; Takahiro Katsuda; Kazuto Tasaki; Kazuhiro Takehara; Takanori Yokoyama; Hideki Furuya; Kyoko Hongo; Masatoshi Asano; Takashi Ikeno; Masashi Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sato; Hitoshi Saito; Chiaki Mashima; Ryo Kamata; Akihiro Ohashi; Suguru Odajima; Hiroshi Tanabe; Tetsuro Taki; Yasuto Fujimoto; Hirohiko Miyake; Reiko Watanabe; Genichiro Ishii; Toru Mukohara
Clinical Cancer Research  Published:October 15 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-4887

Abstract

Purpose:

Preclinical studies suggest that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition enhances tumor immunogenicity through stimulation of IFN genes pathway activation, providing rationale for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, clinical evidence supporting this synergy remains limited. We conducted a neoadjuvant pilot study evaluating olaparib with or without pembrolizumab in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)–positive advanced ovarian cancer.

Patients and Methods:

Patients with newly diagnosed, HRD-positive International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III to IV high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer were enrolled. HRD status was determined using the Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus test. Patients received olaparib monotherapy (300 mg twice daily for 6 weeks; cohort 1, n = 10) or olaparib plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for two cycles; cohort 2, n = 20), followed by surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Exploratory IHC and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses assessed tumor microenvironmental changes.

Results:

The ORR was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.7–81.3] in cohort 1 and 70% (95% CI, 45.7–88.1) in cohort 2 (P = 0.2839). In cohort 1, responses occurred only in BRCA2-mutated tumors (5/5, 100%). In cohort 2, the ORR was 84.6% (11/13) in BRCA1/2-mutated tumors and 42.9% (3/7) in non–BRCA1/2-mutated tumors. Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability were not associated with response. Olaparib monotherapy did not increase tumor immunogenicity, whereas the combination increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration and immune-related transcriptional changes. No unexpected toxicities were observed.

Conclusions:

Neoadjuvant olaparib showed measurable radiographic activity in HRD-positive advanced ovarian cancer. Pembrolizumab enhanced immune activation, but its impact on early clinical response seemed limited.

医療・健康
ad
ad
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました