術前化学免疫療法は頭頸部がん患者で免疫療法単独より有効(Preoperative Chemo-Immunotherapy More Effective Than Immunotherapy Alone in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer)

ad

2026-08-13 マウントサイナイ医療システム(MSHS)

米国のIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaiの研究チームは、頭頸部がん患者を対象とした研究で、手術前に免疫療法単独を行うよりも、化学療法と免疫療法を組み合わせた術前治療(化学免疫療法)の方が高い治療効果を示すことを明らかにした。研究では、術前に化学療法と免疫チェックポイント阻害薬を併用した患者群で、腫瘍の縮小や病理学的奏効率がより高く、がん細胞の残存が少ない傾向が確認された。これは化学療法が腫瘍抗原の放出や免疫応答の活性化を促し、免疫療法の効果を高めるためと考えられる。今回の成果は、頭頸部がんに対する術前治療戦略の改善につながる可能性があり、再発リスクの低減や長期予後の向上が期待される。今後は大規模臨床試験を通じて有効性と安全性のさらなる検証が進められる見込みである。

<関連情報>

頭頸部扁平上皮癌に対する術前化学免疫療法後の病理学的反応 Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Ethan A. Gomez, BS; Daniel O. Kraft, MD; Yehia Elkersh, BA;et al
JAMA Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery  Published:August 13, 2026
DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2026.2259

Key Points

Question Does neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy produce higher rates of pathologic response than neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone in patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)?

Findings In this cohort study of 86 patients, a deep pathologic response (complete or major) occurred in 67.0% of patients who received chemoimmunotherapy vs 3.6% who received immunotherapy alone, a significant difference that persisted after propensity score adjustment.

Meaning These findings indicate that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may substantially improve pathologic response in resectable HNSCC, supporting prospective trials to evaluate its effect on survival.

Abstract

Importance Treatment outcomes for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain suboptimal, and strategies to improve response to therapy are needed. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promise, but pathologic response rates remain modest with single-agent regimens.

Objective To compare rates of pathologic response between neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAI) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) in patients with resectable HNSCC treated in an off-trial setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with pathologically confirmed HNSCC of the aerodigestive tract who received at least 1 cycle of NAI or NACI followed by definitive surgery at a large, urban tertiary academic referral center from July 19, 2024, to March 4, 2026. Patients with locoregional recurrence were included if treated with curative intent. Propensity score–adjusted analyses were performed to account for baseline differences between treatment groups. Data were analyzed from March 5 to June 17, 2026.

Exposure NAI and NACI, typically administered over 2 cycles, before surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures Pathologic response in the surgical specimen, categorized as pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumor), or partial response. Deep pathologic response was defined as pCR or MPR.

Results Among 86 participants (mean [SD] age, 63 [12] years; 27 female [31%] and 59 male [69%]), 25 (29%; 95% CI, 21%-39%) achieved pCR and 15 (17%; 95% CI, 11%-27%) achieved MPR. pCR or MPR occurred in 39 of 58 NACI recipients (67%; 95% CI, 54%-78%) compared with 1 of 28 NAI recipients (3.6%; 95% CI, 0.6%-17.7%). In propensity score–adjusted analysis, NACI was associated with higher odds of pCR or MPR (odds ratio [OR], 29.1; 95% CI, 6.7-274.7). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few adverse event−related delays to surgery.

Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with substantially higher rates of pCR and MPR compared with immunotherapy alone in resectable HNSCC. These findings support the potential role of combination regimens in improving tumor response, although prospective trials are needed to determine effects on survival.

 

医療・健康
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました