チョウの最適麻酔方法を解明 (If You Need to Anesthetize a Butterfly, Here’s the Best Way to do it)

ad

2026-05-21 ノースカロライナ州立大学(NC State)

米ノースカロライナ州立大学(NC State University)の研究チームは、チョウを安全かつ効率的に麻酔する最適手法を比較検証した。昆虫研究では、翅や体組織を傷つけずに個体を固定する必要があるが、従来の冷却や化学麻酔は生存率や行動への影響が課題だった。研究チームは複数の麻酔方法を比較し、二酸化炭素(CO₂)麻酔や低温処理がチョウの回復時間、活動性、生存率に与える影響を詳細に評価した。その結果、短時間の低温処理が最も安定しており、個体へのストレスや長期影響を最小限に抑えられることが分かった。一方、CO₂麻酔は一部種で行動変化や回復遅延を引き起こす可能性が示された。研究成果は、昆虫生理学や行動学、保全研究での標準的取り扱い手法改善につながると期待される。特に希少種調査や標識研究など、個体への負荷低減が重要な分野への応用が見込まれる。

<関連情報>

紙凧蝶における麻酔技術の調査(IDEA LEUCONOE) INVESTIGATION OF ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES IN PAPER KITE BUTTERFLIES (IDEA LEUCONOE)

Samuel M. Tucker, Gregory A. Lewbart, Yang Qu, Ulrich Hartmond, Julie A. Balko
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine  Published:3 April 2026
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1638/2025-0082

チョウの最適麻酔方法を解明 (If You Need to Anesthetize a Butterfly, Here’s the Best Way to do it)

Abstract

Despite the frequency of invertebrates in research, zoological, and personal collections, sedation and anesthesia in these species remains poorly studied. This study assessed anesthetic techniques in paper kite butterflies (Idea leuconoe). Thirty-six recently emerged butterflies were individually placed in 1.9 L air-tight containers and randomly exposed to one of six treatments (n = 6/group): 5% isoflurane via vaporizer (2 L min–1, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 1.0); (V), 0.5 mL (CB0.5) or 3.0 mL (CB3) liquid isoflurane on a cotton ball (FiO2 0.21); 100% carbon dioxide via flowmeter (2 L min–1) (CO2); cooling at 2.78°C, or no treatment (control) (CT). Three min (V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2) or 10 min (°C) following recumbency, butterflies were removed from exposure, manually manipulated, and monitored for return to upright posture. Times to recumbency, return to upright, and response to manipulation were recorded. Collected data were compared between groups (significance P < 0.05). Except in CT, all butterflies achieved recumbency. Median (range) time to recumbency was 1.3 (0.5–3.6), 2.8 (1.6–4.6), 1.7 (0.9–2.9), 1.2 (0.8–2.2), and 1.4 (1.0–3.5) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2, and °C, respectively (P = 0.106). Median (range) time to upright was 9.3 (0.7–15.2), 13.8 (6.0–24.0), 14.9 (8.2–26.6), 1.3 (0.9–9.0), and 9.6 (3.6–30.0) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2, and °C, respectively (P = 0.019). All butterflies recovered uneventfully. This is the first peer-reviewed evaluation of anesthetic techniques in butterflies.

生物環境工学
ad
ad
Follow
ad
タイトルとURLをコピーしました